Introducing McCue Counseling

Welcome!

I’m pleased and proud to be contributing a first blog entry to the McCue Counseling website. The pandemic has afforded me the opportunity to collaborate professionally with my son, Ri Bornstein, on the creation of this site. Ri designed the layout and wrote the content. He will continue to be a regular contributor. To learn more about Ri’s work visit www.riparian-zone.com or write ripariamccuebornstein@gmail.com

The beginning of the pandemic a year ago called on each of us to create a new life chapter.  It is my intention to hold community on this website as we each strive to live our fullest lives.  That means sharing our strengths, our vulnerabilities, and coming from a place of goodwill. I believe that giving to one another is an expression of generosity of spirit. And it turns out that GIVING significantly contributes to healing! 

In the Spring of 2020 we recognized that there would not be the safety of office space in which to create purposeful therapeutic work.  We then set out to work with what we had.  Useful time was spent between therapist and client over zoom, on phone calls, and in walking sessions. This website is intended to enrich those experiences.   

This pandemic is teaching us all so much about life. I deeply appreciate the power of supporting one another.  My hope is that this website will be a platform for that kind of experience. 

I invite you to contribute.  You are welcome to submit your writing,  share resources that you find helpful in your life, and to suggest literature to review.

I look forward to learning from and with you all!

Notes On “The Master Plan”

=

by Ri Bornstein

 The Master Plan opens on the moments before the author, Chris Wilson, takes the only opportunity he will have to advocate for his freedom from a life long prison sentence.  He describes the trip from his prison cell to the witness stand methodically, recalling each interaction with guards and prisoners verbatim, relaying the questions that coursed through his mind along the way.  The stakes and anxiety of this pivotal event are extraordinary.  Even so, the author’s honest, uncomplicated reporting of his internal and external circumstances grounds the re-telling.  As we are led through Chris’s life growing up amidst the American drug war and within the prison system The Master Plan emerges as his persistent, grounded doctrine for self-determination and forgiveness.  His struggles for freedom, respect and self-acceptance are unimpeachable arguments for a revolution in how we understand institutional punishment and personal transformation in America. 

The memoir begins with Chris’ early life amidst the extraordinary violence on Division St. in Southeast Washington, D.C. and in Prince George’s County Maryland in the 1980’s and 90’s.  He describes the crack epidemic from a child’s perspective, sleeping on the floor of the bedroom in his grandmother’s house to avoid stray bullets.  He loves to read and discovers Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave” in a children’s book of myths.  He refers to this period as “The Cave”.  Chris is one of Plato’s cave-dwellers, shackled to the rock, staring at shadows, believing the fear and doubt of his circumstances are the only way the world works. 

His initial descriptions of his mother, on the other hand, offer the first moments of uplifting energy.  “Mom loved me openly.  She enjoyed me.  Her smile made me believe that happiness was possible and that the world was more than hustling to put food on the table.  Grandma taught me to work, but Mom taught me to dream”.  Although he refrains from drawing the connection explicitly his capacity to sustain the vision of a Master Plan must in part be due to this period of unconditional love and the dreaming his mom encouraged. 

Unfortunately, early in Chris’ life, his mom begins to sink into tragic circumstances.  She dates a man he refers to only as “the cop”.  She and the cop get into heavy drug use and his Mom spends less and less time with Chris. Chris walks in on several episodes of the cop physically abusing her.  

One night, now thirteen years old, Chris comes home to find the cop assaulting his mother again.  He attempts to intervene and the cop inflicts intense violence on both Chris and his mother after which Chris watches, helplessly, as the cop sexually assaults his mother.  Chris acknowledges that after this episode his mother and he are intrinsically damaged.  

When I started reading I assumed I would be disturbed by scenes of violence from the drug war and the prison system.  I did not anticipate how physical and sustained those reactions would be.  My stomach twisted while I read the chapter on the assault.  I had vague, directionless nightmares the night afterward. As Chris’ fatigue deepened over the following chapters, I found I was looking up from the page disoriented, off balance, thoroughly bound up in his pain. 

After the assault Chris turns to friends and cousins on Division Street for community. Gun violence, and partying, become routine. His cousin is murdered by a rival. A close friend is killed soon after that.  An investigating officer shows Chris a map of the ten square blocks of his neighborhood which details more than eighty murders over the course of the past six years.  

During an afternoon walk down the road out in the county he is pursued by two adults.  They threaten him, intimating that they know where his mother lives.  Chris draws a gun, fires at the men, and runs.  He kills one of them.

Chris is picked up by the police a few weeks later.  Eventually, at the age of seventeen, he is sentenced to life in prison for the murder. 

Chris begins to formulate his Master Plan over the course of the next section of the memoir.  He is assigned to the Patuxent youth prison on a six-month probationary period.  As a “lifer” he assumes, and is terrified of the prospect that he will eventually be transferred to the harder Annex with the general population of the prison. Chris’ remaining family slowly distance themselves from him over his first few months on the inside and he begins to realize that he will have to survive his incarceration alone. 

The initial plan is the first of many generations of lists, some of which are re-created from memory and re-printed in the book. The list is a mixture of commitments to new behaviors and “endgames”.  

That’s the question I ask people when I think they’re ready to make a move.  It’s the question I want everyone to ask themselves-and keep asking: “What’s my endgame?”
Why are you here on planet earth? Where do you want your life to go? Okay, you got your high school degree, that’s good, but why? Where is it taking you? How can it help you get there? (What’s Your Endgame?)

 The Master Plan includes endgames like learning foreign languages, traveling the world, buying a Corvette, and meeting a beautiful, business savvy woman.  He commits to “Stop calling home every day” “Always seek advice”, and “Work out six days a week (gain thirty pounds of muscle)”.

“Positive delusions” are another important supporting concept he develops: daydreams that can be acquired by focusing on his endgame. “If you do the work, you deserve the reward”. His first visions are cut from magazines and collaged together. Dune buggies driven through the desert and parties on balconies in South Beach Florida. 

In the first years of his incarceration Chris is laser focused on living by and for the plan.  He finishes his GED and throws himself into the prison carpentry program.  He spends his free time reading or exercising. “It’s the action, not just the reward,” he summarizes. “It’s being the artist, not just admiring the view.  That’s the endgame.  Do you understand?” 

He accomplishes incredible things: founding a tutoring center, painting murals, kickstarting a successful portrait business, creating and financing a newly independent youth prisoners council with the proceeds of the business, and helping to begin a bachelors program in the prison.  His tenacity is relayed in the same even, temperate style with which he describes the violence of his early life. 

Whether he is accomplishing a goal or processing a loss, Chris level-headedly returns to the promise of the Master Plan. He does not often describe extreme emotions like despair or rage. His temperament reminded of my first reading of The Autobiography of Malcom X.  Alex Haley invited me to experience my own consciousness raising alongside Malcolm as he disentangled the etymology and history of white supremacy and committed himself to the discipline of Islam.  The memoir’s honesty about Malcolm’s dismay, mourning, resentment, and determination were avenues to follow, for me, from disempowerment to the willpower necessary for radical commitment. Similarly, Chris’ framework for the life-long work of fulfilling the plan protects his psyche, and buoys our reading, from the dehumanization of prison. 

We get to experience the emotional maturing of this philosophy as Chris fulfills the plan point of attending every group therapy available in the prison.  He dislikes sharing and reflecting in a group and he admits that after nine years of imprisonment he is losing faith in his capacity to stay committed to the plan as he watches younger and less disciplined prisoners in group therapy come and go.  Alongside this, after nearly a decade imprisoned and an incredible commitment to change and good works, his lawyer believes Chris’ story could motivate a judge to reduce his sentence.  Between his weariness and the new possibility for release, Chris describes arriving at remorse as a deepening of his commitment to change:

Remorse isn’t feeling bad about what you have done.  It’s not “accepting responsibility”. I had done that years before.  Remorse is bigger.  It is acknowledging that you did something irrevocably wrong, followed by the overwhelming feeling that you need to dedicate your life to making up for that sin.

It’s powerful.  It’s wonderful.  It’s the only thing that will free you from the hate you feel inside.  Remorse is what held me up during times of stress and depression.  It’s what helped me through those long crushing years.  It’s a purpose, lifting you up…
(Remorse)

This sense of purpose sustains Chris until an eventual hearing with Judge Cathy Serrette.  His work inside the prison and the newest generation of the Master Plan, which focuses on Chris’ continuing education and the building of businesses in Baltimore to employ others returning to civil society from prison, motivates the judge to grant him a greatly reduced sentence. She tells Chris that she expects him to continue to follow his Master Plan.

A fascinating third of the memoir is devoted to Chris’ attempts to fulfill this promise living and working Baltimore.  He works strenuously against the stigma of being a former convict in nearly every aspect of his life. He reveals and hides his past from potential employers, business associates and friends.  He searches vainly for work when no employer will hire him. He lives on couches for months when no landlord will rent to him.  He struggles to create a successful construction firm when no loan officer will lend him money.  

Once again, Chris develops a positive philosophical shift to sustain himself amidst this adversity.  As he maneuvers through these obstruction with help from friends and mentors he begins to advocate for a re-framed identity from former convict to “returning citizen”. 

Chris allows the frustration that motivates this philosophical commitment to be fully on display.  He argues that the gate-keepers at every level of society are actively or passively pushing for his re-incarceration.  Returning citizens who are required to present their past crimes as active parts of their identity are unable to demonstrate rehabilitation.  Just importantly, they are barred from participation in democratic society. A former convict’s citizenship is challenged so persistently it as if their past crimes were committed in the present.  

In the introduction, author Wes Moore frames the memoir as an emerging philosophy:


“We are all better than our worst decisions, our sense of justice should honor the redemptive possibilities inherent in every person, and our destinies are truly intertwined”. 

Throughout the memoir we read about the prejudgement that Chris and any other returning citizen is unworthy of redemption.  Part of the power of the memoir is Chris’ return to his worthiness, again and again, through his commitment to transformation. The Master Plan is a list of concrete goals but Chris’ capacity to re-invest again and again in the plan’s promise, when all other investments are closed off to him, is the living practice of the philosophy Moore describes. 

 Chris estimates that 70% of people currently incarcerated want to rehabilitate and change their lives.  He believes that anyone can develop a master plan to achieve personal transformation. He advocates for a major shift in public policy devoted to education and care in prison which will authentically support imprisoned people’s rehabilitation. He also believes it is up to each imprisoned person to take what opportunities they can and work tenaciously to achieve the endgames of their own master plans. 

The Master Plan  is a lived philosophy with no punches drawn.  While Chris may not delve into all of his pain, he offers us his strength as an example and an aid for all of our own liberation.

Gabor Maté on Bio-Psycho-Social Medicine

by Ri Bornstein


Dr. Gabor Maté is a leading voice for the compassionate treatment of addiction and trauma. His work as a physician spans family medicine, palliative care, and clinical rehabilitation. Books covering childhood development, (“Hold on to Your Kids”) and trauma (“When the Body Says No”) are internationally best-selling arguments for a humanist approach to medicine and parenting woven with anecdotes from his years of practice. I recently attended a talk he gave on the relationship between stress and illness. ]For the majority of the talk Dr. Maté focused on the inter-relatedness of three domains of disease and health: social conditions, psychological states and reactions, and biological/chemical phenomena. He cited George Engel’s “Bio-Psycho-Social” paradigm to summarize the interactivity of these systems and gave many examples from his own family medical practice as well as cases from different colleagues and studies. 

    Maté told us that most medical students are encouraged to approach disease as an exclusively biological event that rarely if ever requires information about a patient’s emotional or social circumstances in order to be successfully treated. Maté claimed that this hierarchical system resulted in a majority of treatments being only partially effective or understood.  Current research, he explained, is opening up the interrelatedness of the body’s biological symptoms and emotional states.
    He rattled off a long list of statistical correlations between trauma and chronic disease: Women with PTSD symptoms have a statistically higher likelihood of ovarian cancer. Men who were sexually abused are 3X more likely to have heart attacks and have a 50% increased chance of having cancer. 

He also told a few anecdotes about patients of his who, after addressing serious emotional issues, were relieved of physical symptoms from what they believed to be unrelated conditions.  A woman with scleroderma, a hardening of muscle groups throughout the body, was able to walk for the first time in years and focus on her writing after processing a childhood trauma in therapy.
    What really interested me was his descriptions of the interconnectivity of the body’s regulatory systems. Hearing an insult, for instance, generates responses in the limbic system, fight/flight/freeze, that raises the heart rate, shifts hormones, affecting the cardiovascular system and the gut. Stress and social isolation disrupt the body’s ability to co-regulate hormonal, neural, vascular and other systems. 
Physiology, he said, connects the hormonal system, vascular system, and emotional regulatory regions of the brain. As there is a unity of the components of a cell, so is there unity to these systems.

Maté stressed that we have to understand the body’s organs and systems as coextensive branches of the nervous system and connected to our emotions. One of his examples was that expressions we often use to describe embodied feelings (“gut feeling”, “You are in my heart”) have physiological underpinnings. These intuitions aren’t metaphorical, they’re biologically factual. Our memories and experiences are stored and reacted to by organs and systems throughout the body.
    I also appreciated his concise description of traumatic symptoms, which he addressed in the Q & A: i) Repressing our own needs. ii) Suppressing or overindulging anger (this one he didn’t give much information about). iii) Rigid identification with a role rather than self (this was fascinating to me, I hadn’t heard it before. Hiding from self and obsessively attaching to a role to fulfill in work or personal life) iv) Hyper responsiveness to stress.

I’m looking forward to reading his older work. I’d also like to get a copy of the new work that focuses on this material.